← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9792/2023allowed

Priyanka Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-20Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9792 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2022 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

PRIYANKA DEVI W/O Neeraj Kumar R/O Village- Nagariyawan, P.SKhizarsarai, District- Gaya (Bihar) 2.

Sindhu Devi W/O Gautam Kumar R/O Village- Nagariyawan, P.SKhizarsarai, District- Gaya (Bihar) 3.

Lalti Devi W/O Kaushlendra Kumar Singh R/O Village- Nagariyawan, P.SKhizarsarai, District- Gaya (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP.

Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 27/25(1-b) 26/37 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, petitioners are said to have assaulted the wife of the informant due to which she sustained injury. They also snatched Mangal Sutra from her neck.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9792 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 been falsely implicated in this case due to property dispute. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted property dispute between the parties. The injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the nature of the injuries is simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case No. 149 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T