Randhir Kumar Singh @ Randhir Singh @ Gambhir Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10521 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Randhir Kumar Singh @ Randhir Singh @ Gambhir Singh, aged about 39 Years, Male, Son of Jamuna Singh, Resident of village- Karama, P.S.- Karakat, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Soni Kumari, aged about 32 Years, Female, D/o Shiv Kumar Singh, Resident of village- Bishambharpur, P.S.- Chauri, District- Bhojpur (Ara). ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Shiv Prasad Gupta, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 379, 504/34 of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D. P. Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10521 of 2019(2) dt.21-02-2019 2/2 in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is the husband of the victim. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 155 of 2018, District-Bhojpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T