Vikash Yadav @ Faudi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56283 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56283 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2010 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ====================================================== VIKASH YADAV @ FAUDI YADAV, S/O LATE RAM KISHUN YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GIRDHARA, P.S.- PARAIYA, DISTRICT- GAYA.

.... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mustaque Alam, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 84 of 2010 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear form the F.I.R. that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but in course of investigation the name the petitioner has got implicated in the supervision note of the Dy.S.P., which would appear from paragraph 10 of the petition, thereafter the petitioner was remanded in the present case as he was accused in Tekari

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56283 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015 (Gaya) P.S. Case No. 126 of 2010. It is further submitted that petitioner is accused in 17 other cases, but in all cases, he is on bail.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Sherghati at Gaya, in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 84 of 2010. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T