← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3102/2022withdrawn

Rajesh Kumar v. The Union Of India

2023-10-06The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3102 of 2022 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar, Son of Shivjee Kumar, Resident of Village - Gadopur, P.O. Mahua, P.S. Mahua, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India, New Delhi.

2.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Bihar Legislative Council, Patna through the Secretary. 4.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Election Commission of India through the Secretary, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi.

6.

The Chief Election Commissioner, The Election Commission of India Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi.

7.

The Chief Electoral Officer, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG-3 Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, A.C. to AAG-3 For the UOI :

Dr. Krishna Nandan Singh (ASG) Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, CGC For the B.L.C.

:

Mr. Aditya Prakash Sahay, Advocate Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the E.C.

:

Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 06-10-2023 The prayer made in the writ petition has been allowed by a Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 24.06.2015 passed in CWJC No. 6132 of 2015 and the matter is said to be pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special

Patna High Court CWJC No.3102 of 2022(11) dt.06-10-2023 2/2 Leave to Appeal (C) No. 17113 of 2015. A further writ petition for the very same relief is not maintainable. Learned counsel for the petitioner then submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.

2. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate remedies.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Rajiv Roy, J) P.K.P./- U