Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5157/2017disposed

Sintu Yadav @ Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5157 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2015 Thana -LODIPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Sintu Yadav @ Satyendra Yadav, S/o Suggan Yadav, resident of villageBabupur, P.S.- Sabour, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No. 123 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Section 302/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 05.12.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that the investigation in this case is still going on, as such, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner, the privilege of regular bail at this stage. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after submission of charge-sheet in the court below itself, which will be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5157 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017 2/2 considered by the learned court below taking into account the fact that petitioner's name has come in this case on confessional statement and also co-accused on whose confessional statement the petitioner's name has surfaced, has already been granted the privilege of bail and also considering other materials available at that time and shall pass an appropriate order, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U