Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1585 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -353 Year- 2016 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Manoj Kumar son of Late Kishun Dayal Ram resident of Village - Daru, P.S. Daru, District - Hazaribagh.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rameshwar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 272, 273 and 120 (B) of the I.P.C and sections 47 (a), 48 (2) and 54 of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

Allegedly, from the Bolero Pick-up Van 1000 liters country made liquor was recovered besides one motorcycle and mobiles and the petitioner and three others were apprehended. Submission is of false implication and that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, he has been made victim of the circumstances and is suffering in custody since 09.09.2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1585 of 2017 (2) dt.19-01-2017 2/2 The learned A.P.P. submits that huge quantity of illicit liquor was recovered from the pick-up van which was specially made for carrying the illicit liquor.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering custody of the petitioner, now he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. Sherghati, Gaya in Barachatti P.S. Case No. 353 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T