Kr. Horo Rosa @ H. Rosa v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6411 of 2021 ====================================================== Kr. Horo Rosa @ H. Rosa Daughter of Late Thomas Horo House No. 365, Judge Colony, Kalyanpur, P.O.- Hatiya District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Union of India Through the Secretary, Ministry of H.R.D., Now Ministry of Education, Government of India, New Delhi (Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan).

3.

The Secretary Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare, Government of India, 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi. 4.

The Principal Government Ayurvedic College and Hospital, Kadamkuan, Patna.

5.

The Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (Hqr.), New Delhi. 6.

The Assistant Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, Regional Office, Patna.

7.

The Superintendent (Accounts) Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi. 8.

The Finance Officer Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi. 9.

The Principal Kendriya Vidyalaya, D.L.W. Varanasi (U.P.) 10.

The Principal Kendriya Vidyalaya, H.E.C. Ranchi (Jharkhand). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Anima Loisa Topno, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Radhika Raman, CGC Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. Panel Counsel ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER 13-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In the instant petition, petitioner is an employee of the Kendriya Vidyalaya. Her grievance is required to be redressed before the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1986 read with the relevant notification by which Kendriya Vidyalaya institution have been

Patna High Court CWJC No.6411 of 2021(5) dt.13-04-2022 2/2 brought under the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal read with L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India and Others reported in (1997) 3 SCC 261 decision of the Apex Court.

Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed reserving liberty to approach Central Administrative Tribunal. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) GAURAV S./- U