Md. Ekhlaque v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55664 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -283 Year- 2014 Thana -BISFI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Md. Ekhlaque .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anjum Perveen, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar 3, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02-03-2016 The prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 12.08.2015 in Cr. Misc. No. 30181 of 2015 because of wrong submission made in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. Now the petitioner states in paragraph 3 that he is accused in one another case in which he is on bail.
Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 283 of 2014 on condition that
1. One of the bailors will be Md. Nesarul Haque, brother-in-law of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55664 of 2015 (2) dt.02-03-2016 2/2 will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner.
2. That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,
3. That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.
4. That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/- U T