← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11412/2023allowed

Vimal Thakur @ Karan Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-09Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11412 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2022 Thana- KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- Katihar ====================================================== Vimal Thakur @ Karan Kumar Thakur S/O Shankar Thakur @ Shankar Lal Thakur R/O Village- Paikwahan, P.S- Azamnagar, District- Katihar, At Present R/O Village- Bheriya Rahika Goshala, P.S- Mufassil, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Sah @ Baranwal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 09-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per prosecution case, informant alleged that coaccused called her husband but he did not return by late night after that she got information that dead body due to bullet injuries of her husband lying near Shiv Mandir. It is further alleged that when informant along with deceased was going to a shop then co-accused persons along with this petitioner was planning to fire bullet in such a manner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11412 of 2023(3) dt.09-05-2023 2/3 nobody would know about it.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is close friend of the deceased and merely on the basis of suspicion he has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no specific allegation of firing leveled against the petitioner and no consistent evidence found against him. Petitioner has no concern with the co-accused persons and not a single witness has stated about the presence of the petitioner at the place of occurrence. He has got no criminal antecedent. Similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 06.04.2023 passed in Cr. Misc No. 73930 of 2022. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 19.06.2022.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11412 of 2023(3) dt.09-05-2023 3/3 directed to be released on bail in connection with Katihar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 105 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Katihar.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Manish/- U T