Ragini Priyadarshni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3609 of 2023 ====================================================== Ragini Priyadarshni daughter of Digvijay Prasad Singh, Wife of Dipak Kumar Chaudhary @ Deepak Kumar Chaudhary, resident of Village- Manjuroha, Ward No.- 2, Panchayat- Mahindwara, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamadhi and at present resident of Road No.- 4/31, Chankya Vihar Colony, Gobarsahi, P.O.- Khabra, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director, Department of Intergrated Child Development, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Secretary, Department of Intergrated Child Development, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Commissioner, Tirhut Range, Tirhut Commissionary, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 5.
The District Magistrate, District- Sitamarhi. 6.
The Addl. Collector, Sitamadhi Sadar, Sitamarhi. 7.
The Sub- Divisional Officer, District- Sitamarhi. 8.
The District Program Officer, Department of Intergrated Child Development, Sitamarhi.
9.
The District Welfare Officer, District- Sitamarhi. 10.
The Child Development Project Officer, Block- Runnisaidpur, DistrictSitamarhi. 11.
Anima Kumar, Wife of Satish Shankar Thakur, resident of Village- Majroha, Gram Panchayat Raj Mahindwara, Ward No.- 2, Block and P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Madhubala Verma, Adv For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Prasant Pratap ( GP 2 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 08-08-2023 The District Programme Officer has passed an order dated 22.02.2021 in Anganwadi Appeal No. 04 of 2018 rejecting the petitioner's appeal wherein issue regarding Angwandi Sevika at Centre No. 133, ward no. 2 in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3609 of 2023(3) dt.08-08-2023 2/2 District-Sitamarhi has been rejected.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submtis that petitioner would be availing the remedy of appeal/revision before the Additional Commissioner.
With liberty, as prayed, writ petition is dismissed. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) uttam/- U