Md. Alam @ Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9588 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2024 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Md. Alam @ Alam Son of Late Md. Abdul Rahman Resident of VillageBarri (Barari), P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani 2.

Md. Didar @ Md. Dildar @ Dildar Son of Late Abdul Rahman Resident of Village- Barri (Barari), P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 118(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that co-accused Arman has torn the clothes of Ajmeri Khatoon. When it was objected, Arman assaulted with a piece of bamboo on the head of Ajmeri Khatoon. When Najrana Khatoon came to rescue, she was also being assaulted by him. It is further alleged that these petitioners being armed with iron rod and khanti have assaulted the informant along with her grand-daughter and son.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9588 of 2026(2) dt.20-02-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Learned counsel has submitted that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus and from perusal of the injury report, it is clear that only one injury of the informant is grievous. Others have received simple injuries. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 11.12.2025 having no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 291 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Benipatti, Madhubani.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T