Mohsin Khan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10758 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.
Mohsin Khan Son of Mr. Matim Khan Resident of village- Pithauri, PSAkbarpur, District- Nawada at present resident of Mohalla 11C Tiljala Shibtala Lane, PS- Tiljala District-Kolkata (West Bangal) 2.
Md. Firoz Alam Son of Haidar Ali Resident of Village- Sonsihari, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt.- Nawada 3.
Arbind Singh Son of Late Kishnori Singh Resident of Village- Kutari, P.S.- Warisaliganj, Distt.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025 dated 01.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 30C, 30D, 41, 47, 48 and 52 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 1559 empty glass bottles, 2044 pet bottles and 2982 QR codes were recovered from the Bus.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10758 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/2 that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case merely on suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioner nos.1 and 2 are drivers of the vehicle and the petitioner no.3 is the co-driver of the vehicle. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 02.01.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T