Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3157/2017dismissed

Sunil Kumar @ Suneel Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-06Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3157 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -32 Year- 2016 Thana -BELCHHI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Sunil Kumar @ Suneel Kumar, son of Ram Baran Singh, resident of Mohalla- Mokama, Dak Bunglow Road No.3, P.S.-Mokama, DistrictPatna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 06-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

The Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Belchhi (Belchi) P.S. Case No.32 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner was appointed on the post of Teacher on the basis of forged mark sheet. The petitioner produced mark sheet of BE TET for his appointment on the post of Teacher, wherein, 90 marks was written in paper 2. On verification, it was found that he actually got 82 marks in that paper. First Information Report has been lodged on the basis of the order dated 18.05.2015 passed by the Hon'ble High Court in CWJC No.15459 of 2014.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3157 of 2017 (2) dt.06-02-2017 2/2 It has been mentioned in the impugned order that on verification of the mark sheet by the Bihar School Examination Board, the same was found forged. The BDO concerned in para 10 has stated that mark sheet was verified from Bihar School Examination Board and the same was found forged. Similarly, Clerk of Belchi Block Office in para 11 of the case diary has stated the petitioner got the job on the basis of forged document. In such circumstances, this Court does not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.

Prayer is rejected.

The petitioner may surrender before the Court below and seek regular bail, which shall be considered and disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T