Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8192 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -167 Year- 2016 Thana -SHIVSAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Pappu Yadav, Son of Nathuni Yadav, Resident of Village- Luturu , P.S: Sheosagar (Baddi), District: Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER -------------- 06-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No.167 of 2016 registered under Sections 341, 323, 342, 365 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code besides Sections 13, 17 and 20 of the U.A.P. Act.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation, Vijay Rajbhar and Shivmurat Rajbhar were apprehended by the police on suspicion and the police got recorded their confessional statement in which they disclosed the name of the petitioner as their associate having hand in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8192 of 2017 (3) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 commission of the alleged offence. Except that, there is nothing against the petitioner to connect him in the commission of the alleged offence. The petitioner is in custody since 06.07.2016. Further submission is that while the petitioner is accused in more case, as detailed in paragraph-3 to this application, but in that case, the petitioner is on bail.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No.167 of 2016. Out of the two sureties, one must be close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he/she is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T