← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1443/2016disposed

Madan Mohan Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-13Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1443 of 2016 =========================================================== Madan Mohan Singh, Son of late Ram Chetan Singh Resident of Village -Balughat (Dhalan), Jangali Main Road, Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar , through the Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar,Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department , Government of Bihar,Patna

3. Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar, District Chapra.

4. The Vice-Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra

5. The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, AC to GA-9 For the J.P. University : Mr. Nagendra Kr. Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the University, with reference to Annexure-B dated 09.10.2017, submitted that petitioner was asked to provide certain documents, but he has not supplied the documents and without those documents, the University is not in a position to decide the claim of the petitioner. Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the documents have been supplied in the past, but in order to facilitate the University once again he is handing over those documents to the learned counsel for the University in the Court

Patna High Court CWJC No.1443 of 2016 dt.13-03-2018 2/2 itself.

In view of the fact that Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over the relevant documents in the Court itself to the learned counsel for the University, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondent University to take final decision on the claim of the petitioner with regard to payment of arrears on account of promotion within a period of 60 days from today and in case the petitioner is found entitled to monetary benefit, the same shall be extended to the petitioner within a further period of one month.

With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date20.03.2018 Transmission Date