Rajesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.10496 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGALPUR RAIL P.S. DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== RAJESH SINGH, son of Ashok Singh, resident of Vikramshila Colony, P.S. Tatarpur, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madan Mohan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Rail Bhagalpur P.S.Case No. 147 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 401 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has been arrested on suspicion and nothing has been recovered from his possession and petitioner has remained in custody for more than five months having clean antecedent. Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the above submission and considering the period of detention, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10496 of 2017 (2) dt.20-03-2017 2/2 with Rail Bhagalpur P.S.Case No. 147 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(iv) If the petitioner is indulged in such type of offences in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U