← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13318/2024allowed

Sonu Kumar Keshari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-22Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13318 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5989 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Sonu Kumar Keshari, Son of Vijay Prasad Keshri, Resident of Rajapur Pul, Near Pranami Mandir, P.O. and P.S.- S.K. Puri, District- Patna, Bihar - 800001 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, Patna 2.

Naina Keshri @ Naina Devi, Daughter of Ram Babu Keshri, at present Resident of Mohsimpur, Kurtha, Fatuha, Patna, Bihar, Pin-803201 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP For the Opposite Party No. 2 :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate Ms. Pratima Kumari, Advocate Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 5989 (C) of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Section 498 A of the IPC and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

3. Allegation against the petitioner and his family members is that due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry they tortured and assault the complainant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the complainant is residing in her parental home and despite taking all efforts to bring her back she refused to live

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13318 of 2024(6) dt.22-03-2025 2/2 with the petitioner. He further submits that two children are born from the marriage and they are living with the petitioner who is taking care of them.

5. Learned APP as well as learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that complainant has already filed Maintenance Case No.176 of 2022 and Guardianship Case No. 25 of 2022 pending before the Principal Judge, Patna against the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Complaint Case No. 5989 (C) of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T