← Library
Patna High CourtC.Misc./210/2025disposed

Sushila Devi v. Divya Sonali @ Divya Sonali Singh,

2025-07-31Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.210 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Sushila Devi Wife of Upendra Narayan Singh Resident of Village- Poiwa, P.O.- Poiwa, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). 2.

Upendra Narayan Singh, Son of Late Dharmdev Narayan Singh Resident of Village- Poiwa, P.O.- Poiwa, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Divya Sonali @ Divya Sonali Singh, Wife of Late Gautam Kumar Singh Resident of Gaddi Mohalla, P.O. and P.S.- Nagar, District- Giridih (Jharkhand).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy-1, Advocate Mr. U.K. Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 31-07-2025 Record taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the respondent.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The petitioners have approached this Court for setting aside the order dated 04.01.2025 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad in Guardianship Case No. 05 of 2024, whereby and whereunder the learned Family Court proceeded in the matter ex-parte against the petitioners and the evidence of the respondent was closed without cross-examination.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.210 of 2025 dt.31-07-2025 2/3 the petitioners with intention of delaying the disposal of Guardianship Case No. 05 of 2024, filed the present civil miscellaneous though they have not genuine interest in crossexamining the respondent or leading their own evidence. Learned counsel further submits that the necessity for mentioning the case arose when this Court, vide order dated 10.02.2025, directed the learned trial court not to pronounce judgment in Guardianship Case No. 05 of 2024 as the matter before the learned trial court was fixed for judgment after closure of argument of the respondent. Learned counsel further submits that he has no objection if the present petition is allowed and the petitioners are directed to cross-examine the respondent and lead their evidence within a time frame.

5. Since the petitioners have approached this Court with limited prayer for setting aside the order dated 04.01.2025, whereby and whereunder the petitioners have been debarred from cross-examining the respondent in Guardianship Case No. 05 of 2024 and have further been proceeded ex-parte, without going into details of the case, the order dated 04.01.2025 is set aside and the petitioners are directed to cross-examine the respondent stated to be only witness on behalf of the respondent before the learned trial court within a week after receipt of copy

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.210 of 2025 dt.31-07-2025 3/3 of this order. It is further directed that thereafter the petitioners would adduce their evidence and respondent would crossexamine the witnesses, if she so desires, also within a week thereafter.

6. Learned trial court is directed to fix the dates accordingly.

7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present petition stands disposed of.

8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the learned trial court forthwith through Fax/E-mail. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 31.07.2025 Transmission Date NA