Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19651 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2021 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Dilip Kumar SON OF SUKHDEV YADAV R/O VILLAGE- GANESH CHAK, P.O.- BHADEYA, P.S.- BARACHATTI, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md Jubair Ansari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Anita Kumari, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 342, 354, 325, 379, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had moved earlier before this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 22122 of 2023 and the same was dismissed for non-prosecution by an order dated 11.07.2023. It is further submitted that thereafter the present anticipatory bail application has been filed. It is next submitted that petitioner has antecedent of one case and has been falsely implicated in the present case by the informant along with eighteen named accused persons. It is also submitted that there is land dispute in between the side of the petitioner and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19651 of 2024(2) dt.26-04-2024 2/2 informant and the petitioner is alleged to have snatched the chain of the informant but then the impugned order records that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the son of the informant when from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assaulting the son of the informant is against Ajay Yadav.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 290 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T