Vishal Singh @ Vir Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9053 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -346 Year- 2016 Thana -SIWAN MUFFASIL District- SIWAN ====================================================== Vishal Singh @ Vir Singh Son of Ram Pravesh Singh Resident of VillageMatihani Madho, Police Station- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Siwan Muffasil (Dhanauti) Police Station Case No.346 of 2016 for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except that on the basis of confidential information, the name of the petitioner has transpired in this case and there is nothing against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody for about four months. It has also been submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R., it appears that the informant claims to have identified the accused persons, however, the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. From perusal of Para 03 of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9053 of 2017 (2) dt.28-02-2017 2/2 petition, it appears that the petitioner is accused in some other cases also but in the present case, as stated above, his name transpired only on the basis of confidential information and except that there is nothing against the petitioner, as such, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Siwan in connection with Siwan Mufassil (Dhanauti) Police Station Case No.346 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U