Satyendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19020 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -112 Year- 2017 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Satyendra Singh Son of Jayprakash Singh Resident of Village-Dhaudadh, Police Station-Sasaram (model), District-Rohtas at Sasaram .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30 (A), 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegedly, from a truck, bearing Registration No. RJ19GD/1523, total 2581 liter foreign liquor is recovered. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is innocent as he is servant of co-accused, Manoj Gupta and on his direction, he was sitting on the aforesaid truck to take away the loaded liquor to the house of Manoj Gupta. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He is suffering in custody since

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19020 of 2017 (3) dt.30-05-2017 2/2 31.01.2017.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2017 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (S. Kumar, J) sushma/- U