Govind Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17976 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17976 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2017 Thana -KATEYA District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Govind Ram, Son of Sri Bhikhi Ram, Resident of Village- Rulpoeya, P.S. Kateya, District- Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhramveer, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 08.01.2017 in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 07 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 413/414 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and even though he was apprehended with the motorcycle said to have been stolen, his name has not figured in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that the petitioner purchased the motorcycle from one Paras Nath Yadav @ Parshuram which was in the process of being transferred in his name. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17976 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2017 named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-15, Gopalganj, in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 07 of 2017, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/psc U T