← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3203/2016dismissed

Surendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-09Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3203 of 2016 In Cr. W.J.C. No. 596 of 2016 ====================================================== Surendra Rai S/o late Singasan Rai resident of village - Bhatauli, P.S. Nokha, District Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Inspector General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

5. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas.

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rohtas.

7. The Station Head Officer, Nokha Police Station, Rohtas.

8. Kunjan Prasad, S.H.O. Nokha Police Station, Rohtas.

9. Shailendra Prasad S/o Rang Bahadur Sharma resident of village - Tendua, P.S. - Nokha, District - Rohtas.

.... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aditya Nr. Singh Mr. Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh For the Respondent/s : AC to PAAG 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

09-01-2017 Heard Sri Aditya Narain Singh, learned counsel assisted by Sri Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to Principal Addl. Advocate General - 2.

The present petition has been filed with a prayer to restore Cr.W.J.C. No. 596 of 2016, which was primarily filed for quashing of F.I.R.. The said criminal writ petition stood dismissed on 31-08-2016 due to non-prosecution.

Patna High Court MJC No.3203 of 2016 (2) dt.09-01-2017 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner, by way of referring to facts disclosed in the criminal writ petition, tried to persuade the Court that due to unavoidable circumstances, he failed to appear. However, after examining the matter, the Court is not persuaded with the plea for restoration.

The restoration petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U