Santosh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8200 of 2017 (2) dt.10-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8200 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -75 Year- 2016 Thana -GADHPURA District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Santosh Sahni, Son of Anandi Sahni, Resident of Village-Manikpur, P.S.- Gadhpura, District-Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Gadhpura P.S. Case No. 75 of 2016, registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and later on converted to under Section 398 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. rather the name of the petitioner has surfaced in the confessional Statement of Dabloo Singh as recorded in Gardhpura P.S. Case No. 63 of 2016, showing the involvement of the petitioner in the present case. Further submission is that on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, Dabloo Singh, petitioner was also remanded in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8200 of 2017 (2) dt.10-03-2017 Gardhpura P.S. Case No. 63 of 2016, in which, he is on bail and in the present case, he is in custody since 09.12.2016. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Begusarai, in connection with Gadhpura P.S. Case No. 75 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T