Madhav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15704 of 2018 ====================================================== Madhav Kumar son of Sri Ganesh Prasad Choudhary resident of Mohalla - Ward No. 17, Koshi Road, Supaul, P.S. + District - Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.
5. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.
6. The Controller of Examination, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.
7. The Joint Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.
8. The Centre Superintendent, T.C. + 2 High School, Chakla Nirmali, District - Supaul
9. The Centre Superintendent, B.S.S. College, Supaul. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amrit Abhijat For the BSEB :
Mr. Manish Kumar For the State :
Ms. Binita Singh, SC-28 Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, AC to SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-09-2018 Heard counsel for the parties.
It is the petitioner's grievance that though he had appeared in all the papers of the Intermediate Commerce Examination-2018, held by the Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), but in the result he has been shown to be 'fully absent'. The petitioner has approached the Bihar School Examination Board by making a representation in June, 2018, which is said to be yet pending.
Considering the nature of grievance which the
Patna High Court CWJC No.15704 of 2018(2) dt.04-09-2018 2/2 petitioner has, this application is disposed of with a direction to the Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board to ensure that his grievance which the petitioner has raised in his representation and in the present writ application is duly looked into and appropriate decision is taken within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the present order.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) HR/Ashish/- U