Raj Kishore Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -85 Year- 2015 Thana -MOTIHARI MUFASIL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Raj Kishore Sahni Son of Amardeo Sahni Resident of Village Patkhoulia P.s Muffasil District East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 85 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, assault was going on between the petitioner and his brother Keshwar Sahni and when the informant the wife of Keshwar Sahni forbade then the petitioner assaulted the informant resulting she became unconscious and then the informant was informed by her nanand Chinta Devi, that the petitioner took away her husband and later on the dead body of the husband of the informant was found.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33 of 2016 (3) dt.25-02-2016 2/2 Submission is of false implication and that the informant is not an eye witness, no one has seen the petitioner committing the murder of the deceased, some of the witnesses have stated that there was illicit relationship between the informant and the petitioner which was being opposed by the deceased, now good sense has prevailed between the parties and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. opposes.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the allegation attributed against the petitioner serious in nature this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his prayer stands rejected. However let the trial be expedited.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T