Patna High CourtCWJC/1964/2016disposed

Hari Nandan Lal Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-24Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1964 of 2016 ====================================================== Hari Nandan Lal Das S/o Late Sri Narain Lal Das, R/o Village- Kankpur, P.S.- Sakri, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar and Ors

2. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. Vidyut Bhawan, Patna.

3. The Managing Director, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Vidhyut Bhawan, Patna.

4. The Managing Director, Bihar State Power Transmission Company Ltd. Vidhyut Bhawan, Patna.

5. The General Manager HR and Administration Bihar State Power Transmission Company Ltd., Vidhyut Bhaw

6. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer Dursanchar, Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. Telecom

7. The Senior Manager, Finance and Accounts Communication, Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. Vid

8. The Director Terminal Benefit, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhubneshwar Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate For the Resp.Nos. 2 to 8 : Mr. Vikash Chandra Srivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 24-01-2019 Petitioner retired from the post of Supervisor (Tellycommunication) in the respondent Company. He claims benefits of revision of pay. He served a copy of the writ petition on the counsel for the Board on 14.01.2016. Thereafter, the writ petition has been filed in January itself. The respondents on 22.07.2016 have communicated to the petitioner the details of the entire benefits payable to the petitioner upon revision of his pension. The details submitted by the Board is Annexure F to

Patna High Court CWJC No.1964 of 2016 dt.24-01-2019 2/2 the counter affidavit. From the same it appears that during pendency of the writ petition the dues of admissible benefits and revised pension have been paid to the petitioner. No useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant writ petition pending. Writ petition is disposed off. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said calculation then it would be upon the petitioner to agitate his grievance before the authorities.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Prakash/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date