← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3333/2024disposed

Akhileshwar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-06Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3333 of 2024 ====================================================== Akhileshwar Prasad Son of Late Shyam Lal Resident of Near JMD Hotel Mirchaibari, P.S.-Sahayak Thana, District-Katihar represented through his Karpardar, Sri Bibhash Chandra Bharatiya, aged about 70 Years, Male, Son of Late Mahabir Prasad Yadav, Resident of Near JMD Hotel, Mirchaibari, P.S.- Sahayak Thana, Distirct-Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Katihar.

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Katihar.

4.

The Addl. Collector, Katihar.

5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub Division Katihar, District-Katihar. 6.

The Circle Officer, Sadar Katihar, Circle-Katihar, District-Katihar. 7.

The Officer-in-Charge, Sadar Thana Katihar, District-Katihar. 8.

Pradeep Kumar Bari @ Lalit kr. Bari Son of Late Jagnarayan Bari Resident of Near JMD Hotel, Mirchaibari, P.S.-Sahayak Thana, District-Katihar. 9.

Gautam Kuma Bari @ Lakki Kumar Son of Late Jagnarayan Bari Resident of Daso Tola, Hirday Ganj, P.S.-Sahayak, District-Katihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priyank Samdarshi, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Pleader (26) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-05-2024 The present writ has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. For direction upon the Respondents to take immediate and appropriate action, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and personal property of the Petitioner is protected from the Private Respondent No.8 & 9, who being an antisocial element is harassing the Petitioner and are trying to occupy the possession of the Petitioner's

Patna High Court CWJC No.3333 of 2024(2) dt.06-05-2024 2/2 property which is situated next to the Private Respondent in connivance with the State Respondents in view of the representation/application made to the Authorities (Respondent No.1 to 7) from time to time in this behalf as well as the law settled by the Hon'ble Court in an identical matter contained in Order dated 11.1.2013 passed in CWJC No. 530 of 2013."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate, Katihar, for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U