← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19667/2016disposed

Sanjay Kumar v. The Managing Director, Bihar State Food And Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. And ORS

2023-04-13Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19667 of 2016 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Son of Sri Dharam Nath Prasad, resident of Balia House, Pupri Bazar, Police Station- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Patna 2.

The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Sitamarhi.

3.

The Sub Divisional Officer-cum-Rent Controller, Pupri, District- Sitamarhi. 4.

The Chief Controller of Finance, Headquarters, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Ltd. Patna 5.

The Chief of Storage, Headquarters, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prasoom Sinha,Adv.

Mr.Prabhat Kumar,Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Sinha,AC to GA-9 For the BSFC :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh,Adv.

Mrs.Usha Kumari,Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 13-04-2023 In pursuance to the earlier order of this Court dated 07.04.2023, as also in compliance to the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Rent Controller, Pupri, the learned counsel for the respondent-Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited has produced a cheque in favour of the petitioner, for a sum of Rs.21,37,409/-, in lieu of the outstanding rent due and payable to the petitioner. The said cheque is

Patna High Court CWJC No.19667 of 2016(3) dt.13-04-2023 2/2 handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances of the petitioner has now stood redressed, hence, the petitioner does not wish to press the present writ petition.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/SonalU