Manoj Mehta @ Manoj Mahto @ Manoj Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57074 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2014 Thana -SARSI District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Manoj Mehta @ Manoj Mahto @ Manoj Kumar Mahto son of Chandeshwari Mahto of Kurwaghat, Jiyanganj, P.S.- Sarsi, District- Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyaverat Verma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No.38 of 2014 corresponding to Sessions Trial No.825 of 2014, registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code but chargesheet has been framed against the petitioner under Section 304(B) and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner has earlier moved before this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.10906 of 2015 for bail and this Court vide order dated 26.6.2015 rejected the bail application of the petitioner.

This Court had called for the case dairy. Paragraph

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57074 of 2015 (4) dt.24-02-2016 2/2 Nos. 12, 15, 16, 17, 25 and 30 describes the nature of death received by the victim.

This Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. However, the Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible preferably within a period of one year from today. The prosecution is direction to ensure the production of the witnesses, so that the trial may be completed within the aforesaid period. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U