Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Raut v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9807 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2034 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Jamui ====================================================== Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Raut S/o- Late Ambika Prasad Raut @ Late Anik Ray @ Ambika Ray Village- Itaun Ps- Chanan Dist- Lakhisarai A/P- Andal East Railway Colony No-13, Near Durga Mandir Ps- Andal DistBardhman W.B ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Naresh Rawat S/o- Jagdish Rawat R/o- Ujhandi W.No-2, Ps Dist- Jamui ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Brajesh Saya, Ms. Amrita Kumari & Miss Aadya Dipti, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh, APP Mr.Pramod Kumar,Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 1,25,000/- (Rupees one lakh twenty five thousand) through cheques in 14 installments, as full and final settlement amount and opposite party no. 2 has accepted the offer and gave his consent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9807 of 2025(4) dt.17-02-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute and confirms the fact regarding settlement entered into between the parties.
5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.
6. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.
7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Complaint Case No. 2034-C of 2018, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, learned Court below shall be at
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9807 of 2025(4) dt.17-02-2026 3/3 liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T