← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18251/2017rejected

Md. Qamruzzama Siddiquee @ Md. Kamruzama Siddique @ Kamruzama Siddique v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-10Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 18251 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -121 Year- 2014 Thana -ANDAR District- SIWAN ====================================================== Md. Qamruzzama Siddiquee @ Md. Kamruzama Siddique @ Kamruzama Siddique Son of Late Abdul Ahmed Siddiquee, Resident of village - Mian Ke Bhatkan, P.S. Andar, District - Siwan .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

10-05-2017 Heard Sri S.K.Lal, learned counsel assisted by Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Sangeeta Sharma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. This is the 2nd attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner in Andar P.S. Case No. 121 of 2014 registered for offence under Section 302 & other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier, the prayer for bail of petitioner was rejected on 12-07-2016, vide Cr. Misc. No. 26749 of 2016, considering the fact that there was direct accusation against the petitioner. In this case, by order dated 26-04-2017, a report was called for from the court below, which has been received and kept at flag 'X'. The report suggests that in Andar P.S. Case No. 121 of 2014, chargesheet was submitted showing the petitioner as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18251 of 2017 (3) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 absconder, however; the petitioner is in custody since 05-03-2016 and case is pending for commitment.

Considering the fact that on merit, the prayer for bail was rejected, there is no reason to recall my earlier order. The prayer for bail again stands rejected.

It goes without saying that learned court below may take appropriate step for committal of case without any delay. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T