Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58205/2015bail granted

Munna Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2016-01-29Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58205 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -110 Year- 2013 Thana -SARSI District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Munna Jha Son of late Laxmi kant Jha Village and Police Station sarsi, District Purnia.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 29-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No.110 of 2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The F.I.R. is against unnamed accused and the allegation against them is of causing death while committing dacoity. Mr. Vikram Singh learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that name of this petitioner has transpired on the basis of statement made by co-accused Gautam Singh and Guddu Yadav and except that there is nothing on record to connect him with the crime. He submits that the said two persons have since been acquitted in Sessions Trial No. 214 of 2014. He further submits

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58205 of 2015 (2) dt.29-01-2016 2/2 that neither any recovery has been made from the petitioner nor he has been put on T.I. Parade.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the circumstances existing, let the petitioner namely, Munna Jha be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No.110 of 2013 subject to the condition that the petitioner shall ensure his representation before the Court below on each and every date fixed in the case and failure on the part of the petitioner to ensure his representation on two consecutive dates fixed without reasonable explanation to the satisfaction of the Court below, would entitle the Court concerned to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and to take him into custody.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U T