Wajul Haque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9222 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -182 Year- 2016 Thana -NASRIGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Wajul Haque Ansari, son of Ainul Ansari, resident of Village- Bageya, P.S.- Kachhawa, District- Rohtas (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Nasriganj P.S.Case No. 182 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is in custody for about three months having clean antecedent and except his own confessional statement during investigation there is nothing against the petitioner. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for three months and except his own confessional statement there is nothing against him, let the petitioner, above named, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9222 of 2017 (2) dt.28-02-2017 2/2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, District Rohtas, in connection with Nasriganj P.S.Case No. 182 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U