← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17066/2018disposed

Lalit Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-04-22Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17066 of 2018 ====================================================== Lalit Narayan Yadav Son of Late Muneshwar Yadav, Resident of VillageThika, P.O.- Sonpur, P.S.- Biraul, District- Darbhanga Proprietor of M/s Sri Hari Int Udyog, situated at Mauja-Padhari, Sonpur, P.S.- Biraul, DistrictDarbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principle Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principle Secretary, Department of Industry, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Principle Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Patna through its Member Secretary, Paryavaran Bhawan, Pat 6.

The Chairman, The Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Paryavaran Bhawan, Patliputra Industrial Are 7.

The Member Secretary, The Bihar State Pollution Control Board, Paryavaran Bhawan, Patliputra Indust 8.

The Regional Officer, Regional Office, Muzaffarpur, Industrial Estate Bela, Muzaffarpur of the Biha 9.

The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Bihar, Patna through its Member Secretary, Beltr 10.

The Chairman, The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Bihar, Beltron Bhawan, Shastri Nag 11.

The Collector, Darbhanga District at Collectoriate Compound Laharia Sarai, Darbhanga.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anant Pd. Singh, SC-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on

Patna High Court CWJC No.17066 of 2018(2) dt.22-04-2025 2/2 account of subsequent development, the present writ application has become infructuous and therefore, it may kindly be disposed of.

3. As prayed for, this writ application is disposed of on account of having become infructuous.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) priyanka/- U