← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15471/2018disposed

Kiran Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-09-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15471 of 2018 ====================================================== Kiran Kumari, Daughter of Jagmohan Sada, Resident of Village- Chahi Musharee, At + P.O. Barahkuruwal, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Harding Road, Patna-1.

2.

The Commissioner, Koshi Commissionary, Saharsa. 3.

The District Magistrate, Supaul.

4.

The District Education Officer, Supaul.

5.

The Block Education Extension Officer, Block- Triveniganj, DistrictSupaul. 6.

The Headmaster, Primary School, Chahi Mushari Gram Panchayt, Barahkurulwa, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 7.

Ramjee Sada, Secretary-cum-Member Tolla Sevak, Selection Committee, Ward No. 8, Barahkurwa, Gram Panchayat- Barahkuruwa, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 8.

Chhotki Devi, Adhyaksha President, Tola Sevak, Selection Committed, Ward No. 8, Gram Panchayat- Barahkuruwa, P.S.- Triveniganj, DistrictSupaul 9.

Anar Devi, Member, Tola Selection Committee Gram Panchayat Barahkuruwa, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 10.

Mohan Sada cum Member Tola Selection Committee Gram Panchayat Barahkuruwa, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. 11.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Supaul ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kr.Roy-1 Sc13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Supaul as respondent no.11.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

The present writ application involves the issue of payment of salary/remuneration.

Patna High Court CWJC No.15471 of 2018(2) dt.19-09-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been paid salary since January, 2011. Considering the aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Supaul to take appropriate decision with regard to the claim of the petitioner for payment of salary/remuneration after verification of the record. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Supaul shall verify the legality and validity of the appointment of the petitioner and also to verify the actual period of working of the petitioner and on satisfaction as to the legality and validity of the appointment and actual working of the petitioner, the respondent District Programme Officer (Establishment), Supaul shall pass appropriate order for payment of salary/remuneration.

Necessary decision in this regard may be taken by the respondent District Programme Officer (Establishment), Supaul at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U