Anand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.478 of 2018 Arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 13218 of 2017 ====================================================== Anand Kumar Son of Late Shailendra Yadav, Resident of Village-Bhalni, P.S.- Murliganj, District-Madhepura. Bihar.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Patna.
3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Patna.
4. The Deputy Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, New Secretariat, Patna,
5. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saharsa,
6. The District Education Officer, Saharsa,
7. The District Education Officer Establishment, Saharsa.
8. The District Education Officer, Madhepura,
9. The District Project Officer, Establishment, Madhepura,
10. The District Education Officer Establishment, Supaul,
11. The Block Education Extension Officer, Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Ratan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Amarendra Kumar, A.C. to AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 25-01-2019 Re: I.A. No. 2757 of 2018 Heard Shri Ratan Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Amarendra Kumar, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No. 15 for the State.
2. The appeal is reported to be delayed by 13 days.
3. We have considered the affidavit filed in support of
Patna High Court LPA No.478 of 2018(2) dt.25-01-2019 2/2 the delay condonation application and we find that sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is condoned and the appeal shall be treated to be within time.
4. I.A. No. 2757 of 2018 stands allowed accordingly. Re: L.P.A. No. 478 of 2018 Learned counsel for the appellant and the respondents both inform that arising out of the same issue Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 485 of 2018 and 501 of 2018 were dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court on 16th July, 2018. We have perused the said decisions and in view thereof this Letters Patent Appeal also stands dismissed on the same grounds.
(Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) P.K.P./-Jagdish U