Gulab Chand Bosh @ Gulab Chandra Bosh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11917 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2022 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Gulab Chand Bosh @ Gulab Chandra Bosh Son Of Sri Shiv Pujan Sharma R/V- Biyar Bandh, P.S- Sheosagar In The District Of Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, Bihar, Patna Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-07-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the supplementary affidavit today in the Court.

2. Let it be kept on record.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Vigilance and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

4. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

5. It is alleged in the FIR that the petitioner has produced Intermediate mark-sheet for the appointment of Panchayat Teacher and he has got service as Panchayat Teacher. After verification of mark-sheet/certificate, it is found that intermediate mark-sheet of the petitioner is fake.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11917 of 2023(7) dt.28-07-2023 2/2 case. He submits that the petitioner has been appointed in the year 2017 at that time the required qualification for the said post was of Matric and the petitioner submitted mark-sheet of Matriculation, therefore, there is no question to submit that mark-sheet of I.A. because that is not required. He submits that the petitioner has tendered his resignation. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

7. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sheosagar P.S. Case No. 204 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T