← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2941/2018withdrawn

Lalla Sao v. Mr. Pratay Amrit Managing Director, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna And ORS

2023-02-17Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2941 of 2018 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4415 of 2013 ====================================================== Lalla Sao S/o Late Munshi Sao, Resident of Mohalla- Bare Ki Gali, P.S.- Chowk, Patna City, Town and District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Mr. Pratay Amrit Managing Director, Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna and Ors 2.

Mr. Sandeep Praksh, Executive Engineer, Bihar State Electricity Board having its office at Mitan Gh 3.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Baranwal, Assistant Engineer, Cum- Sub Divisional Engineer, Bihar State Electricit 4.

Mr. Anil Kumar, Junior Engineer, Bihar State Electricity Board having its office at Mangal Talab, G ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. D.K. Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Abhinay Raj, Advocate For the SBPDCL :

Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Sr. Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2023 Re: I.A. No. 01 of 2021 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior counsel for the South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited.

The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that I.A. No.01 of 2021 in the present application has been filed seeking substitution of the legal heirs of the petitioner, who died on 28.04.2021.

The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner next

Patna High Court MJC No.2941 of 2018(3) dt.17-02-2023 2/2 submits that the name of the legal heirs are mentioned at Paragraph - 1 of the petition.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, the I.A. No. 01 of 2021 is allowed. The legal heirs of the petitioner are permitted to be substituted in the present proceedings.

Re:. M.J.C. 2941 of 2018 The learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt application with liberty to resort to remedies available in law to the newly substituted petitioners.

The contempt application is permitted to be withdrawn.

Accordingly, the instant contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Vikash/Rishi2/- U