← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12560/2023allowed

Rajendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-28Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12560 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-462 Year-2019 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

RAJENDRA YADAV SON OF LATE KHIRU YADAV R/O VILLAGEJODHI BIGHA, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA 2.

BAL GOVIND YADAV SON OF RAJENDRA YADAV R/O VILLAGEJODHI BIGHA, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA 3.

ARJUN YADAV SON OF RAJENDRA YADAV R/O VILLAGE- JODHI BIGHA, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA 4.

DINESH YADAV @ DINESH KUMAR @ JINTENDRA KUMAR SON OF RAJENDRA YADAV R/O VILLAGE- JODHI BIGHA, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA 5.

VIKASH KUMAR SON OF BAL GOVIND YADAV R/O VILLAGEJODHI BIGHA, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA 6.

BABY DEVI WIFE OF BAL GOVIND YADAV R/O VILLAGE- JODHI BIGHA, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA 7.

RINKU DEVI WIFE OF ARJUN YADAV R/O VILLAGE- JODHI BIGHA, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA 8.

RINKU KUMARI WIFE OF DINESH YADAV @ DINESH KUMAR @ JITENDRA KUMAR R/O VILLAGE- JODHI BIGHA, P.S.- WAZIRGANJ, DISTRICT- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 308, 504, 506, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12560 of 2023(2) dt.28-04-2023 2/3 Allegedly, petitioners along with other accused persons, having deadly weapons, entered the house of the informant and started assaulting him. They also snatched gold Mangalsutra of Mantuj Kumari and earring of Sunaina Devi.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties. The present case is counter blast of Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 461 of 2019. The injuries sustained by the victim are simple in nature except injury no.1 and it is not clear that by whom this injury was caused. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12560 of 2023(2) dt.28-04-2023 3/3 lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 462 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T