← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9734/2025bail granted

Suman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-24Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9734 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-872 Year-2024 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== Suman Kumar Son of Damodar Prasad Sah Resident of Meerganj, P.S. - Meerganj, District - Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Katihar Nagar Sahayak PS Case No. 872 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 8(c), 21(b) & 22(b) of the NDPS Act. 3.

Prosecution allegation, in short, is that altogether 200 gram smack is recovered from the possession of the petitioner and co-accused.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9734 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/2 further submits that petitioner has no concern with the recovered contraband. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 20-112024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, recovery below commercial quantity, and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Katihar Nagar Sahayak PS Case No. 872 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T