Sanjeev Kumar Yadav @ Tiae Yadav @ Tiyari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11257 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2018 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj ====================================================== SANJEEV KUMAR YADAV @ TIAE YADAV @ TIYARI YADAV S/o Late Langandev Yadav Resident of Village-Bhagwantola, P.S.-Uchkagaon, District-Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Harendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Bachan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 272 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 153.520 litres of foreign liquor from the Orchard. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The said liquor was recovered from the orchard which was not related with the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11257 of 2019(2) dt.27-02-2019 2/2 antecedent and he is in custody since 03.01.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional District Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Gopalganj, in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 272 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.
(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T