Nagendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10267 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2021 Thana- SIDHWALIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== NAGENDRA PRASAD Son of Devnath Prasad Resident of VillageChamanpura, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Vigilance Investigation Bureau,Bihar, Panta, 6 Circular Road, Road, Patna Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner secured appointment as teacher based on forged and fabricated marksheet.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that this Court had given animosity to those

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10267 of 2022(2) dt.06-09-2022 2/3 teachers who had sought appointment on forged and fabricated certificate and had barely directed that such teachers should resign within a time frame but since petitioner was aware and was knowing that this certificate are not forged and fabricated as such he continued, it is next submitted that petitioner had appeared in his matriculation examination with Roll Code No. 09216 in the year 1990, as such it cannot be alleged that petitioner had sought appointment on forged and fabricated certificate.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions and specific averments made in the anticipatory bail application by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No. 273 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10267 of 2022(2) dt.06-09-2022 3/3 In the event, if police after investigation submits charge-sheet against the petitioner then the present anticipatory bail order shall lose its effect.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T