Ravi Ranjan Rajak v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6957 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2016 Thana -ITADHI District- BUXAR ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan Rajak, son of Vinod Rajak, resident of Village-Kukudha, P.S.- Itarhi, District-Buxar.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Amrendra Kumar with Mr. Manish Rai Sharma, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Itarhi P.S.Case No. 101 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except that petitioner is a member of mob there is nothing against him and so far as the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, he is on bail in other cases and actually he has been made accused in that case during the year 2016. Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that petitioner has criminal antecedent. Heard both sides. Considering the fact that no doubt petitioner is accused in five other cases, as stated in the petition,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6957 of 2017 (2) dt.17-02-2017 2/2 but in the present case he is only a member of mob and no allegation is attributed against him and he is in custody for five months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Buxar, in connection with Itarhi P.S.Case No. 101 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U