Mintu Kumar @ Mintu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12026 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Mintu Kumar @ Mintu Sah Son of Late Sitaram Sah Resident of Village - Ghasipakar, P.S. - Chakia, District - East Champaran, Bihar. 2.

Sunil Kumar Son of Late Sudama Sah Resident of Village - Ghasipakar, P.S. - Chakia, District - East Champaran, Bihar.

3.

Sandip Kumar Son of Binod Sah Resident of Village - Ghasipakar, P.S. - Chakia, District - East Champaran, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 328 of 2025, for offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per prosecution case is that the petitioners and others FIR named accused are alleged of assaulting the victim causing simple injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. There is no specific allegation of assault or overt act is against the petitioners rather the allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12026 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 is general and omnibus. Petitioners claims clean antecedent. Similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 04.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 89446 of 2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature, the application for anticipatory bail stands allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari/concerned Court below, in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 328 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T