Abdul Rahim @ Abdul Rahman Uddin @ Abdul Rahman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9792 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2018 Thana- TERHAGACHH District- Kishanganj ====================================================== 1.
Abdul Rahim @ Abdul Rahman Uddin @ Abdul Rahman Son of Late Harun Rashid Resident of Village - Kharra Belbari, P.S. - Terhagachh, District - Kishanganj 2.
Shahnwaz @ Shahnwaz Alam Son of Abdul Rahim @ Abdul Rahman Uddin @ Abdul Rahman Resident of Village - Kharra Belbari, P.S. - Terhagachh, District - Kishanganj 3.
Shayra Khatoon Wife of Abdul Rahim @ Abdul Rahman Uddin @ Abdul Rahman Resident of Village - Kharra Belbari, P.S. - Terhagachh, District - Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Amal Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-03-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 504, 506, 448, 427, 379 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, a dispute arose between the parties over constructing a toilet which led to an altercation in which it is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9792 of 2025(2) dt.22-03-2025 2/3 alleged that these petitioners assaulted informant and others.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Both parties are Gotiyas. As a matter of fact, due to petty dispute, an altercation took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Kishanganj in connection with Terhagachh P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9792 of 2025(2) dt.22-03-2025 3/3 97 of 2018 (G.R. No. 1927/2018), subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T