Vikky Rai v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6962 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4005 Year- 2013 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Vikky Rai Son of Ram Chandra Yadav, Resident of Mohalla- Didarganj, Police Station-Didarganj, District-Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Anjali Kumari Wife of Vikky Rai, Resident of Mohalla-Didarganj, P.S.- Didarganj, District-Patna, Presently residing D/o Rajendra Rai, VillageGurmian, P.S.-Kartahan out Post, Lalganj, District-Vaishali. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with complaint Case No.4005 of 2013, Tr. No. 357 of 2016 for the offence instituted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is of subjecting mental and physical torture upon the informant for demand of Rs. 2 lac and lastly she was ousted from the house on 27.11.2013. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6962 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2017 2/2 of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation made in the Complaint case is denied by the petitioner. The petitioner further relied upon the Judgment of Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in the matter of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. C1-4005 of 2013, Tr. No. 357 of 2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T