Naushad Shekh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9911 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-363 Year-2025 Thana- MADHUBANI TOWN DistrictMadhubani ====================================================== Naushad Shekh Son of Daud Shekh Resident of Village- Mangrauni Shekh Toli, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case no. 363 of 2025 registered under sections 318(4), 316(2), 318(2), 336(2), 338 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the six named accused persons including the petitioner herein executed a registered sale deed on 9.9.2019 with respect to an immovable property. The informant further states that on going over the land in question, which was the subject matter of the sale deed, the agnates stated that the land sold by the accused including the petitioner herein did not fall in their share.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9911 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Besides the dispute being one purely civil in nature, it is submitted that the sale deed as stated in the FIR was executed in the year 2019 and the FIR came to be lodged in the year 2025. The petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2025 and undertakes to cooperate in the investigation. He has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the FIR, the registered sale deed having been executed as per the allegations in the FIR in September, 2019 and the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, in the fact of the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case no. 363 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani.

(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T