Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10757/2023bail granted

Md. Kamare Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-24Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10757 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2021 Thana- NAANPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

MD. KAMARE ALAM SON OF MD. AINUL R/O VILLAGEBUDHNAGARA, P.S.- NAANPUR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI 2.

MD. GULJAR SON OF MD. KAMARE ALAM R/O VILLAGEBUDHNAGARA, P.S.- NAANPUR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI 3.

KAMROON NISHA WIFE OF MD. KAMARE ALAM R/O VILLAGEBUDHNAGARA, P.S.- NAANPUR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI 4.

IBRANA KHATOON @ IBRANA PRAVIN WIFE OF MD. SAJJAD R/O VILLAGE- BUDHNAGARA, P.S.- NAANPUR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Smiti Bharti For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 At the outset of argument learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to make correction in prayer portion of the petition.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307, 324, 379 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, on account of land dispute, these petitioners along with other FIR named accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10757 of 2023(3) dt.24-06-2023 2/2 persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant and his family members.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. It is further submitted that on account of land dispute simple Mar-pit took place. The injuries caused by the petitioners are found to be simple in nature. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Nanpur PS case No. 145/ 2021, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T