Rohit Kr@Bablookrodiya@Bablu Kr Karoliya@Bablookalaviya@Bablu Krkaloriya@Rohitkr.Karoliya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16909 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2020 Thana- DELHA District- Gaya ====================================================== Rohit Kr@BablooKrodiya@Bablu Kr Karoliya@BablooKalaviya@Bablu KrKaloriya@RohitKr.Karoliya SON OF Late Kanhaiya Prasad VillageChhotki Delha PS- Delha Dist -Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 14-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown persons came and intercepted the informant's motorcycle and snatched his bag and mobile in which Rs. 6,64,000/- was kept.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16909 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/2 statement of co-accused Aditya Raj @ Golu Kumar, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He further submitted that the other co-accused has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 16.03.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 39194 of 2020. He is languishing in judicial custody since 22.08.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 183 of 2020.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T